By clicking on the button “I accept” or by further usage of this website you express consent with usage of cookies as well as you grant us the permission to collect and process personal data about your activity on this website. Such information are used to determine personalised content and display of the relevant advertisement on social networks and other websites. More information about personal data processing can be found on this link Cookie Policy.

Agree

2022-11-18

Differences Between Metal Double-Sheet Detectors, Ultrasonic Double-Sheet Sensors, and Weighing Sensors

Detecting double-sheet stacks is a common pain point in automated feeding. For cost-effectiveness we rank solutions by material type.

Cost-effectiveness ranking for metal sheets: Metal Double-Sheet Detector > Ultrasonic double-sheet sensor > Weighing sensor

Cost-effectiveness ranking for non-metal sheets: Ultrasonic double-sheet sensor > Weighing sensor

 chart 

Below we compare principle, detectable materials, detection accuracy, detection speed and cost.


1. Principle

Metal double-sheet solutions use either dual-probe or single-probe techniques:

Dual-probe: based on the shielding effect of metal on electromagnetic fields.

Single-probe: uses eddy current effects where thickness changes alter the induced coefficient and the controller estimates sheet thickness.

Ultrasonic: differentiates single/double sheets by comparing transmitted acoustic intensity through the material.

Weighing: compares weight to distinguish single vs multiple sheets.


2. Detectable materials

Metal detectors: dedicated to metal sheets and cannot detect non-metallic sheets.

Ultrasonic: works on thin lightweight objects regardless of material, but stability can decrease with perforated or thick sheets.

Weighing: material-agnostic.


3. Detection accuracy

Metal double-sheet sensors: high accuracy (able to detect patterned or perforated sheets).

Ultrasonic sensors: high accuracy.

Weighing sensors: relatively larger error and require waiting for the part to settle before measurement.


4. Detection speed

Metal double-sheet: up to 1,200 pcs/min (detection completes as the sheet passes between probes).

Ultrasonic: above 500 pcs/min (adequate for many applications).

Weighing: below 12 pcs/min (requires placing, settling, weighing, and re-grasp by the robot).


5. Cost

Metal double-sheet detectors: quality models commonly priced above ¥1,700; prices vary by model.

Ultrasonic sensors: quality units typically above ¥2,000.

Weighing sensors: conventional sets for sheet detection around ¥300; however, frequent replacements are common within a year.


6. Detectable thickness

Metal double-sheet detectors: general metal sheets 0.05–4.5 mm; aluminum: 0.1–40 mm.

Ultrasonic sensors: effective for metal sheets within about 1 mm.

Weighing sensors: suitable when single-sheet weight is measurable but not very large.

Recommendation: for metal sheets choose Atonm Metal Double-Sheet Detectors for cost effectiveness; for very thin non-metal sheets choose ultrasonic sensors; consider weighing sensors only if large footprint, extra mechanics, and slow throughput are acceptable.


icon-wechat.svg icon-wechat-active

Wechat

cs-qrcode.png

Scan