2022-11-18
Differences Between Metal Double-Sheet Detectors, Ultrasonic Double-Sheet Sensors, and Weighing Sensors
Detecting double-sheet stacks is a common pain point in automated feeding. For cost-effectiveness we rank solutions by material type.
Cost-effectiveness ranking for metal sheets: Metal Double-Sheet Detector > Ultrasonic double-sheet sensor > Weighing sensor
Cost-effectiveness ranking for non-metal sheets: Ultrasonic double-sheet sensor > Weighing sensor
Below we compare principle, detectable materials, detection accuracy, detection speed and cost.
1. Principle
Metal double-sheet solutions use either dual-probe or single-probe techniques:
Dual-probe: based on the shielding effect of metal on electromagnetic fields.
Single-probe: uses eddy current effects where thickness changes alter the induced coefficient and the controller estimates sheet thickness.
Ultrasonic: differentiates single/double sheets by comparing transmitted acoustic intensity through the material.
Weighing: compares weight to distinguish single vs multiple sheets.
2. Detectable materials
Metal detectors: dedicated to metal sheets and cannot detect non-metallic sheets.
Ultrasonic: works on thin lightweight objects regardless of material, but stability can decrease with perforated or thick sheets.
Weighing: material-agnostic.
3. Detection accuracy
Metal double-sheet sensors: high accuracy (able to detect patterned or perforated sheets).
Ultrasonic sensors: high accuracy.
Weighing sensors: relatively larger error and require waiting for the part to settle before measurement.
4. Detection speed
Metal double-sheet: up to 1,200 pcs/min (detection completes as the sheet passes between probes).
Ultrasonic: above 500 pcs/min (adequate for many applications).
Weighing: below 12 pcs/min (requires placing, settling, weighing, and re-grasp by the robot).
5. Cost
Metal double-sheet detectors: quality models commonly priced above ¥1,700; prices vary by model.
Ultrasonic sensors: quality units typically above ¥2,000.
Weighing sensors: conventional sets for sheet detection around ¥300; however, frequent replacements are common within a year.
6. Detectable thickness
Metal double-sheet detectors: general metal sheets 0.05–4.5 mm; aluminum: 0.1–40 mm.
Ultrasonic sensors: effective for metal sheets within about 1 mm.
Weighing sensors: suitable when single-sheet weight is measurable but not very large.
Recommendation: for metal sheets choose Atonm Metal Double-Sheet Detectors for cost effectiveness; for very thin non-metal sheets choose ultrasonic sensors; consider weighing sensors only if large footprint, extra mechanics, and slow throughput are acceptable.
You May Be Interested
-
Atonm MDSC-9000T Dual-Channel, Single-Sensor Metal Double-Sheet Detector
2025-12-05
-
Non-Contact “One-to-Four” Double-Sheet Detector 1600S: A New Cost-Reduction and Efficiency Solution for Stamping Lines
2025-11-20
-
Mold damage, production delays? Atonm MDSC-8200T metal double-sheet detector protects automotive stamping lines
2025-10-30
-
Provincial Auto Industry Research Tour | Atonm Engages with the Automotive Supply Chain, Empowering Smart Manufacturing through Sensors
2025-10-11